Thursday 5 March, 2015
Share

Climate policy rests on false assumptions: that 2°C is safe, and that significant fossil fuel use remains possible without crossing catastrophic thresholds.

Summary

  • 2°C climate targets have been exposed as unsafe and scientifically indefensible.

  • No carbon budget remains once feedbacks and climate sensitivity are properly included.

  • A warming that even 0.8°C of warming already triggers dangerous impacts, including irreversible ice sheet loss and rising seas.

  • Arctic thresholds have been passed, unlocking permafrost carbon and accelerating runaway warming.

  • Risk assessments underestimate urgency; a precautionary emergency response is now essential.

Beyond 2°C: Rethinking Climate Targets and Risk

The core assumptions of current climate policymaking—namely, that limiting global warming to 2°C is a safe and achievable target, and that a remaining carbon budget exists to support this goal—are challenged as fundamentally flawed. This report argues that these premises are scientifically and ethically indefensible. Even at just 0.8°C of warming, the world is already experiencing dangerous climate impacts. Treating 2°C as a cap rather than a flexible target reveals there is no viable carbon budget left—especially when incorporating higher climate sensitivities, carbon feedbacks, and emissions from agriculture and deforestation.

The report highlights that several key tipping points have already been breached. West Antarctic glaciers are now in “unstoppable” collapse, locking in 1–4 metres of sea-level rise. Arctic summer sea ice has melted past critical thresholds, threatening the stability of permafrost and methane stores, accelerating further warming, and reducing Earth’s ability to reflect solar radiation. These changes indicate we are entering a phase of rapid, self-reinforcing climate instability.

Ultimately, the report makes clear that 2°C is not a safe guardrail—it is the boundary between dangerous and very dangerous climate change. It is also a full degree above any temperature experienced in the history of human civilisation. The authors call for a complete re-evaluation of climate targets and risk assessments, warning that current policies underplay the urgency and scale of the crisis. A much stronger, precautionary approach is now essential to protect global systems and communities from catastrophic climate disruption.

Ian Dunlop, former Chair of the Australian Coal Association, uses his foreword to condemn decades of political and corporate denial on climate change, especially in Australia. He argues that rising emissions and worsening climate impacts demand emergency action, not the gradual responses still being pursued. Criticising the 2°C target and limited carbon budgets as dangerously inadequate, Dunlop urges NGOs and investors to reject the official narrative and push for honest, realistic solutions that match the true scale of the crisis.

The years of procrastination have cut off options to solve the climate challenge with a graduated response – emergency action is now inevitable if potentially catastrophic and irreversible impacts are to be avoided.

Ian Dunlop
Energy Expert and Strategic Advisor
SCA_ReportCovers_Resize.v2
report

Recount

The 2°C limit is dangerously inadequate; irreversible tipping points are already triggered, leaving no carbon budget to prevent catastrophic impacts.

More Analysis
This submission argues climate disruption, not military rivalry, represents Australia’s greatest security risk, demanding a major rethink of AUKUS-era spending priorities.
Climate disinformation threatens democracy, demanding urgent national response.
Government misses an obvious climate moment during extreme weather crisis.
Policymakers and scientific institutions like the IPCC place too much emphasis on middle-of-the-road probability estimates rather than plausible worst-case outcomes.