Analysis / report

Climate Emergency Defined

What is a Climate Emergency & Does the Evidence Justify One?

By Paul Gilding
Wednesday 11 September, 2019
Share

In the face of rising climate emergency declarations, this report examines whether the term is justified—assessing risk, urgency, and whether today’s response matches the scale of the threat.

Summary

  • Emergency is defined as a threat requiring urgent, large-scale mobilisation beyond normal policy reform.
  • Climate risk is assessed as both material and time-critical.
  • Current political and economic responses fall far short of emergency mode.
  • Historic comparisons show far greater mobilisation for lesser threats.
  • Evidence supports an immediate climate emergency mobilisation.

Responding to Climate as an Emergency

The concept of emergency is interrogated through a clear lens: is the threat both material and urgent enough to warrant a full-scale societal response? This report draws on analogies from natural disasters to wartime mobilisation to unpack what it really means to act in “emergency mode”—and whether climate change meets those criteria.

The report finds that the climate crisis poses clear, escalating risks that are well understood and time-critical. The pace and scale of change now outstrip the capacity of conventional policy and market mechanisms. Without a shift to emergency response strategies, governments are failing in their fundamental duty to protect their citizens.

This report is a wake-up call. It redefines what climate leadership looks like—and what the science now demands.

How much risk are we prepared to take, and how much impact will be acceptable? We can't afford not to have a climate emergency mobilisation.

Paul Gilding
Author & Corporate Advisor
SCA_ReportCovers_Resize.v2
report

Climate Emergency Defined

A focused assessment of whether climate risks now justify an emergency response.

More Analysis
Converging climate, fertiliser and food shocks threaten profound instability across Australia’s region.
A safe climate requires cutting emissions, removing excess carbon and investigating safe ways to cool the planet.
This submission argues climate disruption, not military rivalry, represents Australia’s greatest security risk, demanding a major rethink of AUKUS-era spending priorities.