Analysis / paper

Carbon Budgets For 1.5 & 2°C

The Hidden Risks & Limitations of Current Climate Targets

By Ian Dunlop / David Spratt
Saturday 10 April, 2021
Share

Current carbon budgets for 1.5°C and 2°C warming dangerously underestimate risks, relying on uncertain technologies and ignore critical climate feedbacks, leaving no real margin to avoid severe, irreversible climate impacts.

Summary

  • IPCC carbon budgets underestimate warming and omit critical climate feedbacks.

  • 1.5°C warming likely by 2030 or earlier due to past emissions.

  • No realistic carbon budget exists for limiting warming to 1.5°C.

  • Current greenhouse gases commit Earth to around 2°C warming or more.

  • 2°C warming risks “Hothouse Earth” scenario, with no safe carbon budget available.

This briefing note on carbon budgets for 1.5°C and 2°C warming highlights serious flaws in current climate targets and budgets. It explains that the IPCC’s carbon budgets underestimate actual and future warming by ignoring critical climate feedbacks and relying on overly optimistic risk assumptions. The note stresses that 1.5°C warming is likely to be reached by 2030 or earlier due to past emissions, and that there is effectively no real carbon budget left to limit warming to 1.5°C without relying on speculative, large-scale carbon removal technologies that remain unproven.

Moreover, the briefing warns that current greenhouse gas levels already commit the planet to around 2°C warming or more, a threshold far from safe and potentially triggering irreversible “Hothouse Earth” conditions. It asserts that no credible carbon budget exists for 2°C if a sensible risk-management approach is applied. Even under IPCC assumptions, developed countries with high emissions must achieve zero emissions before 2030 to stand any chance of limiting warming. The overall message is that the carbon budget concept, while politically attractive, is scientifically uncertain and misleading, emphasising the urgent need for immediate, deep emission cuts.

In Australia, business is focussing on a target of zero emission by 2050. The evidence shows that none of these policies accord with the physical realities for a country such as Australia, which has amongst the highest per capita emissions in the world."

Ian Dunlop
Energy Expert and Strategic Advisor
SCA_BriefingPapersCovers_Resize.v3
paper

Carbon Budgets For 1.5 & 2°C

Current carbon budgets underestimate warming by ignoring feedbacks and risky assumptions about climate system behavior.

More Analysis
Converging climate, fertiliser and food shocks threaten profound instability across Australia’s region.
A safe climate requires cutting emissions, removing excess carbon and investigating safe ways to cool the planet.
This submission argues climate disruption, not military rivalry, represents Australia’s greatest security risk, demanding a major rethink of AUKUS-era spending priorities.